Translate

2023년 9월 2일 토요일

불기2567-09-02_승천왕반야바라밀경-k0008-004


『승천왕반야바라밀경』
K0008
T0231

제4권

● 한글대장경 해당부분 열람I
● 한글대장경 해당부분 열람II
○ 통합대장경 사이트 안내

○ 해제[있는경우]
● TTS 음성듣기 안내
※ 이하 부분은 위 대장경 부분에 대해
참조자료를 붙여 자유롭게 연구하는 내용을 적는 공간입니다.
대장경 열람은 위 부분을 참조해주십시오.

자료출처 불교학술원 기금 후원안내페이지





『승천왕반야바라밀경』 ♣0008-004♧




제4권






♥아래는 현재 작성 및 정리 중인 미완성 상태의 글입니다♥

[페이지 내용 업데이트 관련 안내]

❋본문
◎[개별논의]

○ [pt op tr]
[#M_▶더보기|◀접기|

○ 2020_1017_152327_nik_Ar37


○ 2020_1017_153435_can_ab41_s12



○ 2019_1104_095946_nik_ar32_s12 구례 화엄사


○ 2019_1104_114631_can_ct9_s12 구례 화엄사 구층암


○ 2019_1104_102440_can_ct8 구례 화엄사


○ 2018_1022_173801_nik_Ab35 공주 태화산 마곡사


○ 2018_1022_173426_can_ct9_s12 공주 태화산 마곡사


○ 2020_1017_150520_can_Ar12_s12 삼각산 화계사


○ 2020_0930_150124_nik_AB45 화성 용주사


○ 2020_0911_122234_nik_AB7 제천 의림지 대도사


○ 2020_0910_183056_nik_bw5 월악산 신륵사


○ 2020_0910_142942_nik_BW25 속리산 법주사


○ 2020_0910_132304_can_ori_rs 속리산 법주사


○ 2020_0909_154933_can_CT28 무주 백련사


○ 2020_0909_152345_nik_CT33 무주 백련사


○ 2020_0905_134131_nik_ar35 오대산 상원사


○ 2020_0905_114456_can_ar45 오대산 월정사


○ 2020_0905_114054_can_ar45 오대산 월정사


○ 2019_1201_160603_can_ct19_s12 원주 구룡사


○ 2019_1105_173234_nik_ar45_s12 순천 조계산 송광사


○ 2019_1106_102113_nik_bw24_s12 화순 영구산 운주사

● [pt op tr] fr
_M#]


○ 2019_1104_105823_nik_bw24 구례 화엄사



❋❋본문 ◎[개별논의]

★%★
『승천왕반야바라밀경』 ♣0008-004♧






◎◎[개별논의] ❋본문









★1★





◆vman7340

◈Lab value 불기2567/09/02


○ 2019_1004_153951_can_Ar28.jpg


○ [pt op tr] 예술작품 사진 공양, 나무불, 나무법, 나무승 Utagawa-Kuniyoshi-konseimao-hanzui-beset-by-demons.jpg!HD
[#M_▶더보기|◀접기|
Artist: Utagawa-Kuniyoshi
from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utagawa_Kuniyoshi
Title : konseimao-hanzui-beset-by-demons.jpg!HD
Info

Permission & Licensing : Wikiart
● [pt op tr] fr
_M#]


○ [pt op tr] 꽃 공양, 나무불, 나무법, 나무승 Clematis_patens_'Asao'_(étamines_et_stigmates)
[#M_▶더보기|◀접기|
Français : Clematis patens 'Asao' (étamines et stigmates)
Author Vegetal45
Permission & Licensing : Wikipedia
● [pt op tr] fr
_M#]


○ [pt op tr] 아름다운 사진 공양, 나무불, 나무법, 나무승 Gentau_Pic_du_Midi_Ossau
[#M_▶더보기|◀접기|
English: Lake Gentau reflecting the Pic du Midi d'Ossau (Pyrénées-Atlantiques, France).
Author Myrabella
Permission & Licensing : Wikipedia
● [pt op tr] fr
_M#]


♡약천사,문경


○ [pt op tr] 아름다운 풍경사진 공양, 나무불, 나무법, 나무승 ●With Naver 지도

http://buddhism007.tistory.com/5690


BIGFLO & OLI - Dommage


♥단상♥








문서정보 ori 
https://buddhism0077.blogspot.com/2023/09/2567-09-02-k0008-004.html#7340
sfed--승천왕반야바라밀경_K0008_T0231.txt ☞제4권
sfd8--불교단상_2567_09.txt ☞◆vman7340
불기2567-09-02
θθ





■ 선물 퀴즈
방문자선물 안내페이지

다음에 해당하는 단어를 본 페이지 에 댓글로 적어주시면 됩니다.


 범어 말나(末那)의 번역. 


사량(思量)하는 정신의 본체. 해석에 여러 가지가 있음. 

(1) 『구사론(俱舍論)』에서는 ① 심(心)을 심(心)ㆍ의(意)ㆍ식(識)으로 나누어 물건을 사량하는 작용을 의(意)라 함. ② 의와 식을 과거와 현재에 나누어, 식이 일어나는 근기(根基)의 식인, 현재의 식이 멸하여 과거에 들어가 전념(前念)의 식을 말하는 것. 체는 다르지 아니하나 5식은 각기 소의(所依)의 5근이 있으므로 제6 의식(意識)이 의지하는 의근(意根)을 특히 의라 함. 

(2) 『유식론(唯識論)』에서는 8식과 여기에 따라서 일어나는 심소(心所)가 전념(前念)에 멸한 것을 의라 하는 뜻은 『구사론』과 같으나, 제7식의 특징은 작용(제8식이 항상 앞에서 멸하고 뒤에서 생기어, 끊어지지 않고 상속하는 것을 마치 항상불변(恒常不變)하는 아(我)인 존재가 있는 듯이 사량함)으로 보아서, 이 식을 의라 하고, 또 제6식의 가장 가까운 의지(依止)인 점으로 보아 제7식을 의라 함. (3) 『기신론(起信論)』에서는 3세 6추 중 3세와 6추의 전이(前二)를 의라 하니, 곧 업식(業識)ㆍ전식(轉識)ㆍ현식(現識)ㆍ지식(智識)ㆍ상속식(相續識)의 5를 말함.

답 후보
● 의(意)
의무애(義無礙)
의준상사과류(義準相似過類)

이견(二見)
이공관(二空觀)
이교(二敎)
이근(利根)



ॐ मणि पद्मे हूँ
○ [pt op tr]
[#M_▶더보기|◀접기|



■ 음악
Julien Clerc - Lune Lune
Line Renaud - Que Sera Sera
Gerard Lenorman - Ce N'est Rien
Patricia Carli - Les Histoires D'amour
Mireille Mathieu - Adios Sagt Man
Aldebert - J'ai Peur Du Noir
Jean-Louis Murat - Comme Au Cinema



■ 시사, 퀴즈, 유머
뉴스

퀴즈

퀴즈2


유머

■ 한자 파자 넌센스 퀴즈

亡 ■ ( 망할 망 / 없을 무 )
011▲ 己女大万亡 ■ 기녀대만망 11 ( 몸 기 )( 여자 녀 / 너 여 )( 클 대 / 클 태 )( 일 만 만 )( 망할 망 / 없을 무 )
050▲ 凸出平包勹 ■ 철출평포포 50 ( 볼록할 철 )( 날 출/ 단락 척 )( 평평할 평 / 다스릴 편 )( 쌀 포/ 꾸러미 포 )( 쌀 포 ) 재춘법한자


【 】 ⇄✙➠
일본어글자-발음

중국어글자-발음

■ 영어단어 넌센스퀴즈- 예문 자신상황에 맞게 바꿔 짧은글짓기



■ 번역퀴즈
번역
번역연습(기계적 번역내용 오류수정 연습)


■ 영-중-일-범-팔-불어 관련-퀴즈
[wiki-bud] G
[san-chn] laukikaṃ jñānam 世間智
[san-eng] purāṇī $ 범어 very old
[pali-chn] jotika 樹提伽
[pal-eng] lo.nasakkharaa $ 팔리어 f.a crystal of salt.
[Eng-Ch-Eng] 七種真如 The seven kinds of suchness as taught in the Treatise on the Eighteen Emptinesses. The seven are the suchness of arising 生真如, the suchness of marks 相真如, the suchness of consciousness 識真如, the suchness of bases 依止真如, the suchness of mistaken activity 邪行真如, the suchness of purity 清淨真如, and the suchness of correct activity 正行真如. 〔十八空論 1616.31.〕
[Muller-jpn-Eng] 六受 ロクジュ six sensations
[Glossary_of_Buddhism-Eng] ZEN / PURE LAND☞
See also: Chu-Hung; Han-Shan; Pure Land Buddhism (Summary);
Yin-Kuang; Yung-Ming; Zen School.
Please read entries “Pure Land Buddhism (Summary)” and “Zen”
before the following:
In the west, Pure Land and Zen, two of the most popular schools
of Buddhism are sometimes viewed as different forms of practice,
designed for different categories of believers. This is not however the
teaching of Patriarchs and Masters in East Asia where Zen and Pure
Land are considered complementary – like the two wings of a bird.
(I) Wisdom and Compassion
“The Dharma was the pride of T’ang Buddhism (China). From the
founding of the dynasty (618) to the An Lu-shun revolt (755), a
succession of great minds and the schools they championed laid a
philosophical foundation for the future of Mahayana Buddhism.
These schools – T’ien-t’ai, Hua-yen, Pure Land, and Ch’an – can
also be seen as bringing to maturity different forms of piety, stretching back to Indian origins. It is hard enough to see any unity to
Mahayana in India, much less to discern a teleological structure in
Sinitic (Chinese) Mahayana. Yet the emergence of these four schools
was not a fortuitous event, but accorded with the four optimal poles
in Mahayana Buddhology. Buddhas could be either laukika or lokot-
tara (mundane or transmundane), oriented to either prajna or karuna
(wisdom or compassion)… Early Buddhism knew only the ‘historic
didactic’ Sakyamuni Buddha. The idealization of the Buddha began
within the Mahasanghika (q.v.) school, which marked the shift from
the historical to the transhistorical. It was with Mahayana that [transcendental, salvific Buddhas such as Amitabha] emerged; compassion
was given equal status with wisdom in a host of new salvific Buddhas
and Bodhisattvas. A total rehumanization of the Buddha was accomplished in East Asia.”
Yoshi / Lai: 331
(II) Easy vs. Difficult Practice
“The Pure Land school accepted the Zen perspective [on enlightenment] as valid in principle, but questioned how many people could
get results by using Zen methods. Pure Land teachers granted that
Zen might indeed be the ‘supreme vehicle’ but insisted that for most
people it was too rigorous and demanding to be practical. The Pure
Land method of buddha-name recitation was offered as a simpler
method by which average people could make progress toward enlightenment… (J. C. Cleary, Pure Land, Pure Mind.)
Clear: xxx
(III) Zen is Pure land
“When Bodhidharma talked about Ch’an, he was directly pointing at
the luminous self-nature. The one mind of universality is exactly this
luminous self-nature. Even though the two traditions [of Ch’an and
Pure Land] use different terms, what they realize is the same mind.
Well indeed did Chung-feng say this: ‘The dhyana is the dhyana of
the Pure Land, and the Pure Land is the Pure Land of Ch’an.’ Some
people might object by saying that Ch’an does not resort to the written
word, whereas the Pure Land advocates the invocation of the name of
Amitabha Buddha. But, they do not know that [in the Ch’an tradition] the Dharma is transmitted by a verse of four sentences and the
imprinting on the mind is found in the four volumes of the scripture
[the Lankavatara Sutra]. When these are compared with the four
syllables of the name Amitabha, they are indeed far more wordy. As a
matter of fact, not to rely on the written word does not mean to annihilate the written word. An enlightened person knows that it really
means one should refuse to adhere to the written word and yet, at the
same time, not cling to this refusal.”
Yu: 62
“Zen Master Yung-ming’s syncretism went as far as to advocate the
religious practice of the Nembutsu (Buddha Recitation) or invocation
of the name of Amitabha Buddha. This was by no means a complete
innovation, since three disciples of the Fifth Patriarch of Ch’an – Fachih (635-702) and his disciple Chih-wei (646-722), the fourth and
fifth patriarchs of the Ox-head school, as well as Chih-shen (609-702)
– had already practiced the nembutsu in addition to Zen meditation…
During the Sung period, sometimes with the support of the masters
and sometimes against their opposition, the nembutsu made greater
and greater inroads into Zen monasteries. This process of mixing religious practices continued through the Yuan period and came to term
during the Ming dynasty. The simultaneous practice of Zen and the
nembutsu became a matter of common practice. In trying to judge
this whole development, we must not forget the inner affinities of
the two practices. The psychological effects of the meditative repetition of the holy name are close to the effects of Zen meditation… In
China, the syncretistic tendencies and movements during the Sung
period went on to meet with widespread success. In Zen monasteries,
the invocation of Amitabha was practiced in combination with sitting
in meditation. Moreover, during the Ming period we see a complete
fusing of all Chinese Buddhist schools and sects. The more intellectually oriented schools of Avatamsaka and T’ien-T’ai as well as the
Vinaya school were all cast in the same mold, the shape of which was
determined principally by Zen and the Pure Land. Well-known Zen
masters contributed to this unification. One of the most effective was
the respected monk Chu-hung (1535-1615) who, after being admitted
to monastic life by a Zen master, preached the dual practice of Zen
and Buddha Recitation. This highly educated man left behind many
writings. Han-shan Te-ch’ing (1546-1623), the best known Zen master at the end of the Ming period, also combined Zen practice with
devotion to Amitabha Buddha, who, it said, appeared to him while
he was invoking the holy name.” (H. Dumoulin, Zen Buddhism. A
History / India and China, p.286.)
See also the following advice from the eminent 16th century Zen
Master Chu Hung to a lay disciple:
“This Pure Land Path is the most primal and the most subtle and wondrous. It is also the simplest. Because it is simple, those of high intelligence overlook it. Birth and death are not apart from a single moment
of mindfulness. Consequently all the myriad worldly and world-transcending teachings and methods are not apart from a single moment
of mindfulness. Right now take this moment of mindfulness, and
be mindful of buddha, remember buddha, recite the buddha-name.
How close and cutting! What pure essential energy, so solid and real!
If you see through where this mindfulness arises, this is the Amitabha
of our inherent nature. This is the meaning of the patriarch coming
from the West [the meaning of Zen].”
(J. C. Cleary, tr., Pure Land, Pure Mind)
Editor /Zen: 3-4
(IV) Note
“Throughout its history Buddhism [in East Asia] has tended to be
the preserve of the members of an intellectual, spiritual and social
elite, and the focus has almost everywhere been in the monasteries.
Pure Land Buddhism, however, has more general appeal. It offers an
‘easy practice’ that can be implemented in the world, without becoming a monk or nun; and it promises salvation to everyone through
Amitabha’s vows – to those still tied to the passions, even to those
who have committed serious crimes. Profound study and meditation
are moreover distrusted as they are seen as leading to intellectual and
spiritual arrogance. Pure Land was therefore the first really democratic form of Buddhism, stressing humility rather than attainment,
and as such became hugely successful among ordinary East Asians.
Pious societies were spawned under its auspices, like the White Lotus
Society which developed into a sizeable movement… In its heyday,
the good works of its devotees included providing public amenities
(bath-houses, hostels, mills, etc.), donating cloth, copying sutras and
hosting vegetarian banquets. It was unusual in allowing women to
play a prominent part in its affairs. Of the various schools that burgeoned in T’ang dynasty China, only Pure Land and Ch’an (Zen)
had the vitality to survive the great Persecution of 845 (q.v.). Indeed,
in East Asia the methods of both schools were often practiced in tandem for double effectiveness – ‘like a tiger wearing horns.’ ” (Patriarch
Yin-Kuang)
Snell / Elements: 110 #1789
Caveat: “According to Elder Master Yin Kuang, Pure Land followers
should not seek guidance on Pure Land matters from Zen Masters.
This is because the answers of Zen Masters are all directed towards
principle and essence, while the Pure Land approach is based on phenomena and marks. This being the case, and considering the different
areas of emphasis, beginning Pure Land practitioners who do not
yet fully understand essence and marks, noumenon and phenomena,
will not only fail to benefit from the answers of Zen Masters, they
may develop even greater doubts, perplexity and inconsistent views.”
(Buddhism of Wisdom & Faith.)
Tam: 163

[fra-eng] soubresaut $ 불어 jerk, jolt

■ 삼매_게송퀴즈


■ 오늘의 게송
[245일째]
종종수량불가설 $ 116▲無邊轉無邊轉為 一 ● 無等, ○□□□□,如,種,於,種

□□□□□□□, 如其一切悉了知;
種種形量不可說, 於此靡不皆通達。
□□□□□□□, 여기일체실료지;
종종형량불가설, 어차미불개통달。

種種數量不可說,
가지가지 수효를 말 못하는데
그와 같은 모든 것 모두 다 알고
가지가지 형체도 말 못하는데
이런 것 통달하지 못함이 없네.



[246째]
종종삼매불가설 $ 117▲無等無等為 一 ● 無等轉, ○□□□□,悉,於,所,得

□□□□□□□, 悉能經劫於中住,
於不可說諸佛所, 所行清淨不可說。
□□□□□□□, 실능경겁어중주,
어불가설제불소, 소행청정불가설。

種種三昧不可說,
가지가지 삼매 말할 수 없어
여러 겁 지내도록 머물러 있고
말할 수 없는 부처 계신 곳에서
청정하게 닦은 행을 말할 수 없고





●K1045_T2138.txt★ ∴≪A승종십구의론≫_≪K1045≫_≪T2138≫
●K0008_T0231.txt★ ∴≪A승천왕반야바라밀경≫_≪K0008≫_≪T0231≫
●K1484_T1538.txt★ ∴≪A시설론≫_≪K1484≫_≪T1538≫


■ 암산퀴즈


474* 11
43648 / 248


■ 다라니퀴즈

구족수화길상광명대기명주총지 50 번째는?
자비주 11 번째는?
성관자재보살 명호 29 번째는?




50 좋은 말씀은 모든 농사(農事)를 능히 이루어 줍니다.
바라지 리, 波囉祁<上聲>[口*梨]<五十>
pra-ghr
(~!~) 마음의 보호를 성취케 하시고, 온갖 눈병(惡相)으로부터 보호하소서
『대승대집지장십륜경』
♣0057-001♧


11
부처님께서 말씀하시되,
"선남자야 네가 대자대비로
중생을 안락케 하기 위하여
신주(神呪)를 설하고자 하나니
지금 바로 그때라. 속히 설할지니라.
여래께서 네가 설함을 따라 기뻐하니
모든 부처님도 또한 그러할 것이니라."
● 바로기제새바라능다바 婆盧吉帝室佛羅㘄馱婆<十一> ba ru ki te ś va r a ṃ dha va
『불설천수천안관세음보살광대원만무애대비심다라니경』
♣0294-001♧


29
아세다야 노미암 아나 릉가리 다아 다라
阿世怛野<二合>努尾焰<二合>惹曩<引>楞訖哩<二合>哆誐<引>怛囉<二十九二合>
『성관자재보살일백팔명경』
♣1122-001♧







5214
176
법수_암기방안


117 [바이셉쓰biceps ] 알통
50 턱 chin, 【악골】顎
11 위팔 upper arm

29 약지 (RING finger )
116 [암핏 armpit] 겨드랑이
45 발등 instep / top (side) of the foot

■ 오늘의 경전 [이야기, 게송,선시 등]
2567_0902_193917 :

대장경 내 게송



스승님은 지금 나의 구호자시라
이런 거룩한 스승을 만났음이여,
스승의 제자가 되어서 곧
스승의 금계를 어기지 않겠나이다.


출전:
한글대장경 K0985_T0194
승가라찰소집경(僧伽羅刹所集經) 부진 승가발징등역
僧伽羅剎所集經 【符秦 僧伽跋澄等譯】
출처 불교기록문화유산아카이브 통합대장경
https://kabc.dongguk.edu/m

■요가자세 익히기
요가_반박쥐 자세


○ 2020_1114_141430_can_Ab15


○ 2019_1104_101156_can_CT28


○ 2020_0606_190345_can


○ 2020_0606_172101_can


○ 2020_0606_141011_can


○ 2020_0606_133431_can


○ 2020_0606_133334_can


○ 2020_0606_130229_can


○ 2020_0525_190902_can


○ 2020_0525_163758_nik


○ 2018_0419_140525_can


○ 2018_0419_140451_can


○ 2018_0419_140401_can


○ 2018_0419_135105_can


○ 2018_0419_135052_can


○ 2018_0419_131351_can


○ 2018_0419_130014_can


○ 2018_0419_113836_can


○ 2016_1008_150248_can


○ 2016_1008_140830_can

● [pt op tr] fr
_M#]



○ 2018_0419_135505_can

  


™善現智福 키워드 연결 페이지
https://buddhism0077.blogspot.com/2020/06/keyword.html

○ [pt op tr]
● 승천왕반야바라밀경_K0008_T0231 [문서정보]- 일일단상키워드
[#M_▶더보기|◀접기|


『승천왕반야바라밀경』 ♣0008-004♧
[관련키워드]
제4권

■ 본 페이지 ID 정보
불기2567-09-02_승천왕반야바라밀경-K0008-004
https://buddhism0077.blogspot.com/2023/09/2567-09-02-k0008-004.html
sfed--승천왕반야바라밀경_K0008_T0231.txt ☞제4권
sfd8--불교단상_2567_09.txt ☞◆vman7340
불기2567-09-02

https://blog.naver.com/thebest007/223200603948
https://buddhism007.tistory.com/18337
htmback--불기2567-09-02_승천왕반야바라밀경_K0008_T0231-tis.htm
● [pt op tr] fr
_M#]



댓글 없음:

댓글 쓰기

What do you think is the most important?
Do you know why this is the most important?